For Christmas I received an interesting present from a friend - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few easy triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, forum.pinoo.com.tr based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, considering that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody creating one in any person's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around . Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, created by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He intends to expand his range, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really mean human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, fishtanklive.wiki it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for creative functions need to be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without consent ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful however let's develop it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize developers' content on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of happiness," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its finest carrying out markets on the vague guarantee of development."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them accredit their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide information library containing public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector tandme.co.uk over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It is full of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm uncertain for how long I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.